Conatct Rosendorff for Legal Services
Legal Law Firm in Melbourne Melbourne Lawyers
Home
About Us
Our Staff
Our Services
Newsletters
Search
Contact Us
Features
Letter of the month
Latest News
 

New IR law summary

With the Fair Work Bill receiving Royal Assent on 7 April 2009, the Federal Government has followed through on its election promise to do away with 'Workchoices'.

The Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), including the unfair dismissal provisions, came into operation on 1 July 2009. The provisions dealing with Modern Awards and the commencement of the National Employment Standards will come into effect on 1 January 2010.

The Act makes significant changes to the ways in which claims for unfair dismissal will be made, which is discussed below:

When must proceedings be commenced?

From 1 July 2009, an employee who makes a claim for unfair dismissal must do so within 14 days of the date of dismissal. According to the Government the shortened time period for making a claim is designed to resolve issues between employees and employers quickly with a view to maintaining the employment relationship.

Who can make a claim?

To be protected from unfair dismissal, the Act provides that an employee must:

    • Be employed for the minimum employment period (6 months if there are 15 or more employees and 12 months if there are less than 15 employees); and

    • Either:

    • Be covered by a Modern Award;

    • Be covered by a Collective Agreement; or

    • Earn less than the high income threshold which is currently $106,300 per annum exclusive of superannuation.

The Act retains exclusions for employees who are employed for a specified period or task; employed under a training arrangement; or demoted without significant reduction in duties or remuneration.

Exemptions

Small business
The Act changes the position of small business employers. A small business is now defined as a business that employs less than 15 employees.

Note that the transitional arrangements for the Act provide that until 1 January 2011, the small business cut off will be determined as 15 full time equivalent employees. A straight head count will be used after that.

Minimum period of employment
The Act does away with the distinction between probationary periods and qualifying periods. The Act provides that an employee must have been employed for at least 6 months (the minimum period of employment) to be entitled to make a claim for unfair dismissal.

The minimum period of employment is extended to 12 months for a small business employee, i.e. if employment is less than 12 months in a small business, there is no unfair dismissal claim!

The Substantive Application

The Act gives FWA the discretion to hold a conference in relation to an unfair dismissal claim or refer it to a hearing.

Importantly the Act provides that FWA is not required to hold a hearing to exercise its powers. This means that FWA may make orders about a claim from a conference. This is a significant change.

The Act also give FWA the discretion to hold hearings on only certain parts of a matter - the matter may be heard in conference except for one single issue, for example whether or not an employee was properly informed of a policy that was breached.

The Regulations to be made under the Act are yet to be released and it is expected that either the Regulations or the rules of FWA will provide more clarity on the procedure for conferences and hearings.

Genuine Operational Reasons v Genuine Redundancy

The Act provides that a dismissal will not have been unfair if the dismissal was a case of genuine redundancy.

The Act extends employer obligations in this regard when compared to the Workplace Relations Act 1996.

The decision must have been made that an employer no longer required the employee's job to be performed by anyone because of changes in the operational requirements of the employer's enterprise and the employer must have complied with any consultation obligations set out in a Modern Award or Enterprise Agreement.

This is narrower than the current exemption (introduced as part of Workchoices) which refers to a "genuine operational reason or a reason that includes a genuine operational reason".

Further, a dismissal will not have been a case of genuine redundancy if it would have been reasonable in all the circumstances to:

  • Redeploy the employee within the employer's enterprise; or

  • Redeploy the employee within an enterprise of an associated entity of the employer.

This is significant as employers conducting a redundancy process will now have a positive obligation to consider options for redeployment.

What do the changes mean for Employers?

  • The biggest issue will be the shortened time frame for unfair dismissal applications. It is also likely that Employers will find themselves before FWA in a conference quite quickly.

  • Given the fact that the process may be sped up, HR Managers should either obtain advice before terminating an employee in contentious circumstances, or undertake a 'health check' of the process before the decision to terminate is made.

  • As decisions may be made in conference, we recommend Employer's seek advice on the employee's claim prior to attending conferences.

  • There is no longer any 100 employee unfair dismissal exemption.

If you would like to find out more about these issues, please telephone Marita of our office today.

Please note that the advice in this communication is general advice only and you should not rely on this advice unless you obtain legal advice specific to your own requirements.

 
< Prev   Next >
Latest News
The Octaviar Decision - financing arrangements

A recent decision of the Queensland Supreme Court may have serious consequences for many existing secured financing arrangements.

Read more...
 
Tough Times Bring New Bankruptcy Laws

Legislation designed to modernise personal insolvency laws has been introduced.

The amendments to the bankruptcy laws recognise that the majority of bankruptcies relate to consumer debts, and involve people with few assets and little income.

Read more...
 
Recent decisions affecting 'off the plan' sales

it was commonplace for ‘off the plan’ contracts of sale to include clauses granting the vendor a reasonable extension of time to register the subdivision plan upon giving notice to the purchaser. However, the recent decision of Clifford & Anor v Solid Investments Australia Pty Ltd (2009) VSC 223 seems to suggest that such extensions are invalid.

Read more...
 
New IR law summary

With the Fair Work Bill receiving Royal Assent on 7 April 2009, the Federal Government has followed through on its election promise to do away with 'Workchoices'.

Read more...
 
Court Decisions - Director's Penalty Notice and Partnership Dispute

Director's penalty notice

In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Falzon the Queensland Court of Appeal considered whether it was appropriate to set aside a director's penalty notice.

Read more...
 
Charges

It is common for lenders (creditors/mortgagees) to take security of a charge over the debtors/borrowers’ assets to protect their exposure to debtors/borrowers.

Section 262 of the Corporations Act requires certain charges over company assets to be registered with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (‘ASIC’). These charges include:

  • Floating Charges;
  • Charges on personal chattels;
  • Changes over goodwill and patents or trademarks;
  • Charges over book debts; and
  • A charge over crops, wool or stocks.

The charge gives the lender tangible security over the property of a company should the loan fall into default. It is a form of insurance.

A mortgage is different and does not require registration with the ASIC.

A fixed and floating charge over all of a company’s assets would also cover any real property owned by the company.

Charges must be lodged with the ASIC within 45 days of creation. A charge is voidable against a Liquidator or Administrator if it is registered outside the 45 day period, unless it is registered more than 6 months before an appointment.

It is possible for a lender to apply to have the Court extend the 45 day period, but a creditor will need a very good reason why it was not registered in time and these applications are not automatically granted.

The Bankruptcy Act has no provisions for the registration of charges and there is no standard national position regarding the registration of securities over personal assets or property (not including real property). This position is being rectified with the release by the government’s draft “Personal Property Securities Bill 2009”. In the mean time, creditors wishing to take security over personal assets or property must navigate the different provisions in each State or Territory.

If you would like to find out more about charges, please telephone Alan of our office today.

Please note that the advice in this communication is general advice only and you should not rely on this advice unless you obtain legal advice specific to your own requirements.

 
Copyright Protection

Most people know that copyright protects written content, but are less clear about the precise requirements of copyright protection, and just what amounts to copyright infringement. The basics are:

Read more...
 
Confidential Information in the Workplace

To stop former employees using confidential information, you should meet four crucial requirements:

Read more...
 
Insolvency Law Update

This article provides general information on insolvency for directors whose companies are in financial difficulty.

Read more...
 
Tax Relief

At Rosendorff Lawyers, we understand the complexity of your tax problems and will work hard to get you the tax relief you deserve. Recently, we helped Mr. and Mrs. Smith achieve a $115,000 tax relief. With the savings, they can now afford to adopt another child!

We have experienced tax lawyers who can help you with your individual and business tax debt and work towards stopping ATO collection activity. Our tax lawyers aggressively pursue the best possible tax relief solution for each client, saving them thousands of dollars along the way.

We can help you:

  • Settle or contest an existing tax debt;
  • Stop a garnishee notice;
  • Negotiate or re-negotiate a payment plan with the ATO; or
  • Obtain partial or full tax relief 

If you would like to find out more about how you can obtain tax relief, please telephone Alan or Marita of our office today.
 

Read our Earlier Newsletters:

2008 Newsletters

2006 Newsletters

2005 Newsletters

2004 Newsletters 

 
 
 
Rosendorff Lawyers, Level 3, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004. Tel No: (61 3) 8320 2955