Conatct Rosendorff for Legal Services
Legal Law Firm in Melbourne Melbourne Lawyers
Home
About Us
Our Staff
Our Services
Newsletters
Search
Contact Us
Features
Letter of the month
Latest News
 

The Octaviar Decision - financing arrangements

A recent decision of the Queensland Supreme Court may have serious consequences for many existing secured financing arrangements.

The case concerned an application by the Public Trustee of Queensland (PTQ) to terminate two deeds of company arrangement in respect of Octaviar Ltd (Octaviar) and Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd (each members of the finance group formerly known as MFS).

At issue was the effect of a charge purportedly held over the assets of Octaviar by Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Ltd. The PTQ challenged the validity of the Octaviar charge on the basis that, inter alia:

  • there was a variation of the terms of the charge resulting in an increase of the liabilities secured by it; and

  • a notice of the variation was never lodged with ASIC (which amounted to a contravention of section 268(2) of the Corporation Act 2001 ("the Act")) and that accordingly the charge was void.

The drafting technique considered in this decision is very common in the Australian debt markets and therefore the decision may have an impact on a significant number of existing secured financing arrangements.

Accordingly, it would be prudent for secured lenders to:

  • notify ASIC of any variation to the terms of any document with which may result in an increase of the liabilities secured by a registered charge; and

  • review any existing financing arrangements in order to determine whether there has been any change in the liabilities secured requiring ASIC notification.

Where notification can be made within 45 days after the variation, all that will be required is the lodgement of a notice under section 268(2) of the Act. If, however, more than 45 days has elapsed since the date of the relevant variation, it is still important to lodge the variation as soon as possible so as to start the six month waiting period under section 266(3)(c)(ii) of the Act. In certain circumstances, it may be necessary to seek the leave of a court to extend the period for notification, as contemplated under section 266(4) of the Act.

At Rosendorff Lawyers, we can assist you in ensuring that your financial arrangements are compliant with all relevant legislation and ASIC requirements.

Please note that the advice in this communication is general advice only and you should not rely on this advice unless you obtain legal advice specific to your own requirements.

 
Next >
Latest News
The Octaviar Decision - financing arrangements

A recent decision of the Queensland Supreme Court may have serious consequences for many existing secured financing arrangements.

Read more...
 
Tough Times Bring New Bankruptcy Laws

Legislation designed to modernise personal insolvency laws has been introduced.

The amendments to the bankruptcy laws recognise that the majority of bankruptcies relate to consumer debts, and involve people with few assets and little income.

Read more...
 
Recent decisions affecting 'off the plan' sales

it was commonplace for ‘off the plan’ contracts of sale to include clauses granting the vendor a reasonable extension of time to register the subdivision plan upon giving notice to the purchaser. However, the recent decision of Clifford & Anor v Solid Investments Australia Pty Ltd (2009) VSC 223 seems to suggest that such extensions are invalid.

Read more...
 
New IR law summary

With the Fair Work Bill receiving Royal Assent on 7 April 2009, the Federal Government has followed through on its election promise to do away with 'Workchoices'.

Read more...
 
Court Decisions - Director's Penalty Notice and Partnership Dispute

Director's penalty notice

In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Falzon the Queensland Court of Appeal considered whether it was appropriate to set aside a director's penalty notice.

Read more...
 
Charges

It is common for lenders (creditors/mortgagees) to take security of a charge over the debtors/borrowers’ assets to protect their exposure to debtors/borrowers.

Section 262 of the Corporations Act requires certain charges over company assets to be registered with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (‘ASIC’). These charges include:

  • Floating Charges;
  • Charges on personal chattels;
  • Changes over goodwill and patents or trademarks;
  • Charges over book debts; and
  • A charge over crops, wool or stocks.

The charge gives the lender tangible security over the property of a company should the loan fall into default. It is a form of insurance.

A mortgage is different and does not require registration with the ASIC.

A fixed and floating charge over all of a company’s assets would also cover any real property owned by the company.

Charges must be lodged with the ASIC within 45 days of creation. A charge is voidable against a Liquidator or Administrator if it is registered outside the 45 day period, unless it is registered more than 6 months before an appointment.

It is possible for a lender to apply to have the Court extend the 45 day period, but a creditor will need a very good reason why it was not registered in time and these applications are not automatically granted.

The Bankruptcy Act has no provisions for the registration of charges and there is no standard national position regarding the registration of securities over personal assets or property (not including real property). This position is being rectified with the release by the government’s draft “Personal Property Securities Bill 2009”. In the mean time, creditors wishing to take security over personal assets or property must navigate the different provisions in each State or Territory.

If you would like to find out more about charges, please telephone Alan of our office today.

Please note that the advice in this communication is general advice only and you should not rely on this advice unless you obtain legal advice specific to your own requirements.

 
Copyright Protection

Most people know that copyright protects written content, but are less clear about the precise requirements of copyright protection, and just what amounts to copyright infringement. The basics are:

Read more...
 
Confidential Information in the Workplace

To stop former employees using confidential information, you should meet four crucial requirements:

Read more...
 
Insolvency Law Update

This article provides general information on insolvency for directors whose companies are in financial difficulty.

Read more...
 
Tax Relief

At Rosendorff Lawyers, we understand the complexity of your tax problems and will work hard to get you the tax relief you deserve. Recently, we helped Mr. and Mrs. Smith achieve a $115,000 tax relief. With the savings, they can now afford to adopt another child!

We have experienced tax lawyers who can help you with your individual and business tax debt and work towards stopping ATO collection activity. Our tax lawyers aggressively pursue the best possible tax relief solution for each client, saving them thousands of dollars along the way.

We can help you:

  • Settle or contest an existing tax debt;
  • Stop a garnishee notice;
  • Negotiate or re-negotiate a payment plan with the ATO; or
  • Obtain partial or full tax relief 

If you would like to find out more about how you can obtain tax relief, please telephone Alan or Marita of our office today.
 

Read our Earlier Newsletters:

2008 Newsletters

2006 Newsletters

2005 Newsletters

2004 Newsletters 

 
 
 
Rosendorff Lawyers, Level 3, 10 Queens Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004. Tel No: (61 3) 8320 2955